
I remember burbling on about this round about the time of the G8 Gleneagles summit and everybody wearing white wristbands. Can't find the exact link or anything but I doubt that I wrote anything particularly life-affirming or positive. Hard to believe, I know. Anyway, the meeja have seen fit to exhume the story today - and, surprise, surprise, poverty appears to be very much part of the present. The Geldof is perturbed at the lack of action by the G8, promised at the summit (again, no surprise) and all we have to counter this is The Blair's assertion that "...the achievements of the Gleneagles summit were 'greater than all but those with the most rose-tinted spectacles thought was possible...These issues were not high up the political agenda, in the UK, let alone internationally. Now they are.' "
Jolly good. That 'rose-tinted spectacles' line is fantastically opaque hyperbole, isn't it? I mean, even for a politician.
OK, smartarse, what are you doing about poverty then? You may very well be asking, if you can be bothered. Not a lot, is the answer. I could come up with some obtuse argument that in some way I am doing something about poverty but I think 'not a lot' is more honest. 'Sweet Fanny Adams' would be even more so. Perhaps I should emulate that billionaire who said he was going to give away 85% of his wealth the other day. That would, of course, put me in the position of needing to beg for some of that money as I would be 'in poverty', but still, at least I'd be 'doing something'.
I reckon my attitude towards charity is linked to my attitude towards work, you know. I think that if a job is worth doing, it's worth doing 100% and if it's not worth doing, you shouldn't do it. Obviously real life isn't like that and I am forever doing work to 50% quality or less, for various reasons that are ably described in the Dilbert cartoons. Hence giving (or rather, not giving) to charity. Any contribution I make would be like removing a drop from the ocean of poverty, even if I donated 100% of my 'wealth'. So any contribution is just assuaging my conscience, and the politicians who promise so much and do so little are let off the hook once again.
Poverty doesn't go away - our whole world is based on it. With finite resources, if someone has a lot of something, it follows that others must have little or none. I think it shows how much money and power is concentrated in the hands of so few people that even with a world-wide campaign like Make Poverty History, involving millions of people and thier collective 'wealths', poverty is still very much alive and killing.